nadeko.net Guestbook

Anon

on 2025-10-10 12:32 No.1574
No. It's not fedposting. These are facts. You must accept that security matters more than your retarded ideologies. DeGoogle and similar things are conspiratorial nonsense.

>>1569
Google, Microsoft, and Apple are creating a more secure internet. Mozilla, Proton, and other companies deceive people into thinking they can have privacy by pushing them into using insecure, privacy-unfriendly software and protocols like Email (use Signal, SimpleX, or iMessage instead).

People today are misinformed and vulnerable because they listen to random FOSS ideologists instead of actual security experts who know what they're doing.

Instead of Firefox, use Chrome.
Instead of uBlock Origin or other dangerous adblocking extensions, use Chrome's reader mode.
Instead of SponsorBlock and other YouTube extensions, use NewPipe or inv.nadeko.net.

Anon

on 2025-10-10 10:17 No.1573
VirusTotal for: https://ayaya[.]beauty/LFnGL <- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/83564a00747bf5506a858ec04d860e7293c6b99dd7c522d5b5ea8e3c8694e506/details

Anon

on 2025-10-10 07:50 No.1572
Also a note for less seasoned people
Don't give Apple money if you can help it
Don't give it to Google
Don't give it to Amazon
Don't give it to Surfshark, or any other VPN's that commonly sponsor youtubers
Cloudflare is very spooky too
your best bet is with something like MullvadVPN, look for VPN's that scizos use, check out MentalOutlaw on yt, but you're still trusting some company to not give your data to someone.
Tor and I2P is decentralized so theres less chance that multiple nodes you're using are compromised

Anon

on 2025-10-10 07:39 No.1571
>>1567
Yeah troll or fed posting

Anon

on 2025-10-10 07:37 No.1570
>>1565
The idea that you will be targeted for looking like a criminal is retarded
Everybody is targeted, maybe normal people even more than criminals. You don't actually believe the NSA spies on every single human so they can catch terrorists, do you?
And if they actually cared about crime, with all the data they capture they could've stopped SO MANY mass shootings, terrorist attacks, etc.
"We've had him on our radar for years" - The FBI every time someone shoots some political figure.
Also if the tor was ONLY used by criminals or journalists then there would be a gurantied reward on exposing tor users, but if half the traffic is hentai then there is a risk that all the resources you invest to compromise tor will be for nothing. So your advice is malicious to privacy since less normal traffic over tor = less privacy for sensitive traffic.
Every ISP is required by law to record your telemetry and give the government access to it since 1998

>Use Apple Relay or Cloudflare WARP
FED!

a

on 2025-10-10 04:35 No.1569
>To all Chrom* shills
GAFAM is murdering Web standards, pushing the defective-by-design "you own nothing and be happy" apparatus known as "Digital Restrictions Malware" used by Netflix et al., and now, everything is a proprietary WebApp (JavaScript/WASM traps).

>Remember KHTML by KDE?
None does because of GAFAM blinked it using Chrom* and Edge.

http://defectivebydesign.org/repeat-offenders/
http://techrights.org/n/2025/07/25/The_Future_of_the_Web_is_One_Rendering_Engine_or_Flavours_of_Ch.shtml
http://techrights.org/n/2025/09/02/Google_e_Chrome_Passes_70_and_Web_Standards_Are_Dying.shtml
http://invent.kde.org/frameworks/khtml

Anon

on 2025-10-09 23:24 No.1568
>>1558
Recently, I was watching Asmon reacting to the controversy surrounding Charlie's rant about Hasan, and I said, "Fuck 'em. I'll rather just watch some cheaply-made content for kids."

SlopTubers mean nothing to me, and so does mainstream news.

Anon

on 2025-10-09 23:00 No.1567
>>1565
This all seems like a troll post designed to rage bait seasoned veterans.

Anyhow, Tor, the majority of VPNs and ISPs in general's compromisation aside... there is absolutely no such thing as a totally impenetrable browser and there probably never will be. The longer it's around, the more likely a dedicated cracker will discover an exploit in its code. Doesn't matter if it's spaghetti or lasagna, sooner or later, it eventually gets found. This exploit will be either internalized in the browser itself, or externalized through malicious + spying software disguised as a quaint add-on which is installed by an naïve unsuspecting user unaware of the snake that is about to come flying out of what they think is a can of nuts.

Asshole

on 2025-10-09 22:35 No.1566
>>1565
lol edge lord

Anon

on 2025-10-09 21:08 No.1565
More private = more secure

Edge is more private than Tor browser because it is more secure. Tor uses retarded Firefox ESR which doesn't get most vulnerabilities patched by Firefox.

Most people shouldn't use Tor anyways. Tor can be dangerous since Tor nodes are usually malicious, easily identifiable, and associated with illegal activity. Tor is intended to be used only by activists, journalists, whistleblowers, and people in oppressive countries, not regular users. By using Tor you're robbing those in need of bandwidth and putting more unnecessary load on Tor nodes thereby hurting privacy. Your ISP and even many VPNs are likely more trustworthy than Tor. Use Apple Relay or Cloudflare WARP if needed.

RICOTTA_19216

on 2025-10-09 20:32 No.1564
>>1552

Mmmm! To my shopping cart!

Anon

on 2025-10-09 19:26 No.1563
>>1560
>>1562

>Unironic Chrome shills

The only thing that could make this any sadder is if you did it for free.

I seriously hope you guys don't do that.

Anon

on 2025-10-09 16:50 No.1562
>>1561

What >>1560 is saying is correct. Chrome is more secure and is used by tens of billions of people daily, and they are impossible to hack. And linux is for hackers not normal people that should use windows 11.

Anon

on 2025-10-09 16:12 No.1561
>>1560
gaslight fedposting af

>guYs JuSt uSE ChrOEM iT SeCuRe Bb bEcuz iT pOular!!!1

Anon

on 2025-10-09 15:22 No.1560
>>1554
>I mean, use the Un-Mozziled Firefox (e.g. IceCat, LibreWolf, Mullvad), to be exact. Those forks have the "Digital Restrictions Malware" handcuffs crippled in favor of user freedom, with some hardening against "device fingerprinting".
No. That's worse because you get slower updates and all browsers you listed are bloated with ridiculous uBlock Origin and other Manifest V2 malware. And those browsers are actually more fingerprintable because few people use them.

IceCat, LibreWolf, and Mullvad cause more harm than good because they promote the harmful idea that Firefox can be private and secure instead of encouraging users towards the actual private and secure Chrome.

Anon

on 2025-10-09 14:56 No.1559
>>1558
replace it with the guestbook or a separate chat

Asshole

on 2025-10-09 11:41 No.1558
>>1556
yea and it sucks slop balls
oh heres propaganda disguised as news n heres videos about guys spewin nothingburger
doesnt matter if we can hid channels that "popular" shit needs to be removed imo

Anon

on 2025-10-09 09:30 No.1557
>>1556 it always has been >https://americasdigitalshield.com/

Anon

on 2025-10-09 06:23 No.1556
popular tab getting demonic influenced so sad to see. much love

Anon

on 2025-10-09 01:39 No.1555
>>1554
Say you're running Safari on mobile. Is it safe to say the trick won't work and the user will keep getting blocked with "denied by administrative rule" or "bad request"?

a

on 2025-10-09 01:21 No.1554
>>1553
I mean, use the Un-Mozziled Firefox (e.g. IceCat, LibreWolf, Mullvad), to be exact. Those forks have the "Digital Restrictions Malware" handcuffs crippled in favor of user freedom, with some hardening against "device fingerprinting".

>>1545
Forgot to point out the undo trick ONLY WORKS if you are in the tab with the "anti-bot" when the URL flashes, if you switch tab you'll miss. Chromium discards the undo buffer when you switch tabs.

>Why Un-Mozilled?
https://techrights.org/n/2023/10/11/Mitchell_Baker_Running_a_Bank_in_Silicon_Valley.shtml
http://techrights.org/n/2025/07/07/Mozilla_Had_No_Good_Reason_to_Outsource_Firefox_Development_to_.shtml
http://techrights.org/n/2025/10/05/Mozilla_Throw_Away_Your_Old_PC_and_Enable_Digital_Rights_Manage.shtml
TL;DR GAFAM

Nakedo

on 2025-10-08 22:23 No.1553
>>1545
>Get a FireFox-based browser
Insanely insecure.
https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/firefox-chromium.html
https://github.com/RKNF404/chromium-hardening-guide#firefox

Use Chrome, retard.

Anon

on 2025-10-08 19:24 No.1552
fijxu the website has naughty booru girls on the bottom

Anon

on 2025-10-08 19:06 No.1551
why is my name Anon?
https://ayaya.beauty/LFnGL

Anon

on 2025-10-08 15:40 No.1550
hi

Anon

on 2025-10-08 05:23 No.1549
>>1548
Thanks
This captcha spam is getting ridiculous, and if you click the "allow refresh" too quickly it blocks you

a

on 2025-10-07 23:33 No.1548
>>1545
Get a FireFox-based browser, open up the page containing that "anti-bot" and then CTRL-Z the URL entry until you find that link you want to copy. Chromiums discard the undo buffer while FireFox doesn't.

>Doesn't apply to proprietaries like Gulag reCaptcha or ClownFlare captchas though.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 23:30 No.1547
>2025-10-01: Please take this quick strawpoll~~ ;)
>2025-10-07: Chile backend is back! Currently in testing, only use it if you are from south america please!
WHAT A TWIST@!!!

Anon

on 2025-10-07 23:05 No.1546
>>1535
If current setup works well, how about an old good image captcha in case bot owners got creative? As a seasoned datahoarder/scraper (never abused inv btw), I usually feel demotivated if I encounter custom one and immediately look for alternatives.
Invidious even has one inside, that clock on login page if you register with a fresh login.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 20:40 No.1545
The refresh captcha makes it so the url is unreadable if you want to quickly copy the link

Fijxu

on 2025-10-07 17:27 No.1544
>>1542
I had no idea collabs existed, well I don't use youtube ;3
Submitted as feature request on Invidious issues.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 17:23 No.1543
>>1541
The best way to ensure that the user is definitely running JavaScript would be to use all of JavaScript's fucked up quirks, perhaps something like https://github.com/aemkei/jsfuck

FavoritoHJS

on 2025-10-07 15:25 No.1542
Suggestion: Collabs should have all channels involved listed instead of just one
example: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=b2_vBMQmi3M says the author is D/V (without a pfp!) but doesn't mention FLDE.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 14:37 No.1541
>>1540
PoW is an option for sure, though its main advantage (driving up costs for malicious actors) wouldn't work too well here, since handling the video behind the captcha is orders of magnitude more expensive.
For a quick'n dirty solution, just a slightly harder js check would probably hold up for quite a while, splitting the solution url between multiple script tags and/or giving it some parameter that must be calculated via the js: even very easy stuff like doing +10 in one place and -1 in another would be unfeasible to solve without full parsing and evaluation.

Fijxu

on 2025-10-07 13:44 No.1540
>>1538
Yeah the JS-Refresh is a meme, just a link lol.
I have found this https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aeternal-flame-AD%2Fpow-buster+go-away&type=code and solves the sha256 PoW of Go-away (I haven't tested it yet tho and I'll try it later), pretty interesting.

>>1539
>You should probably consider cookie-bound rate limits on the backend instead, still a bandaid measure but at least it might catch an abuser or two scraping videos in parallel: also the per-cookie request data might provide some insight into how to better distinguish normal users from abnormal ones, as long as the cookies live long enough that is.
Yes, I was thinking about that a few days ago. Although I don't have time to work on it right now :/

>Ultimately, you need more clever go-away challenges since the ones you're using aren't holding up well.
I have metrics so I can say it for sure it's working fine, but sooner or later it will die just like any captcha

Anon

on 2025-10-07 13:28 No.1539
>>1535
>That's to prevent bots/abusers from using the Cookie 7 days in a row without any restrictions.
They pass the challenges, they WILL pass them again: and you're not beating them on costs either, 3 additional requests for lightweight pages every hour or so isn't even a rounding error given they're scraping videos.
You should probably consider cookie-bound rate limits on the backend instead, still a bandaid measure but at least it might catch an abuser or two scraping videos in parallel: also the per-cookie request data might provide some insight into how to better distinguish normal users from abnormal ones, as long as the cookies live long enough that is.

Ultimately, you need more clever go-away challenges since the ones you're using aren't holding up well.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 13:16 No.1538
>>1535
>Is not for low effort bot scrapping, not anyone can bypass it
Note the "Why do this?" and "Can't scrapers adapt?" sections of the go-away docs: the whole project was started to deal with ultra-simple braindead crawling (presumably for LLM training), in the hopes it would drive it away by making it harder and costlier.
in your case, abusers have already adapted, and sending them more of the same challenges isn't going to do anything.
On the technical side of things, yes anyone can bypass go-away: not only my search for "go-away" returned pages compiling bot check bypasses before the repo itself, not only are all three checks solved automatically by any headless browser, but even if someone was to code a scraper from scratch none of the three checks requires more than basic HTML parsing (even the js one is a bit of a meme, doesn't even requires eval'ing the contents of the tag, could be probably done just with regex)

Fijxu

on 2025-10-07 12:55 No.1537
...->

IP addresses filter not a silver bullet, they are more like a wallet bullet, they are just a number pointing to some machine. Bots can change their IP easily, specially with IPV6.

I have been always very supportive with people that don't like JS since I started with the instance and Youtube started to rate limit, but I'm honestly getting tired of caring about the <1% of people that use Invidious without JS.

For now I'll keep the Invidious captcha as is, but if some day I see bot behavior using the instance, I'll leverage it to Proof of Work.

And >>1528 is extremely right lol

Fijxu

on 2025-10-07 12:47 No.1536
... ->

If you want to protect yourself from JS RCE, then use NoScript and JShelter and read what the JS does before executing it.

>http://fsf.org/bulletin/2025/spring/defending-savannah-from-ddos-attacks
>Bob added corresponding allowlists, tracking confirmed "real user" behaviors and exempting them from future bans. This isn't a perfect solution, but it is amazingly effective.

That not an option with Invidious and what I provide at all. Is clearly extremely effective to use allowlists, but I'm a single individual, Is literally impossible for me to keep allowlists updated. If I were to ban abusive IP addresses, for sure a LOT of Tor and VPN IPs would be blocked because people abuse Tor and VPNs, so they get on a blocklist, leading to high levels of false positives and people complaining in your Email about them getting blocked (which happened the time I blocked some ASNs, which worked pretty well, but TOO many false positives).

... ->

Fijxu

on 2025-10-07 12:38 No.1535
>>1533
Works pretty well if you ask me. Is not for low effort bot scrapping, not anyone can bypass it
>And there's even less of a point in having validation last a short time
That's to prevent bots/abusers from using the Cookie 7 days in a row without any restrictions.
>Apparently, anti-bots use "proof of work", which, according to the FSF, is the same as cryptomining, making it malware as it is done without the end-user's permission.
Sorry but I couldn't care less about the FSF and their standpoint about anti bot protections. Saying that a Mathematical calculation to pass a challenge is malware makes no sense. You are not cryptomining anything here, nor the server and the client try to mine a small block for profit, they say cryptomining because both calculate hashes, but they purpose is completely different.

... ->

What I'm dealing with here are abusers, not simple LLM bots that you can just IP ban and call it a day

a

on 2025-10-07 11:12 No.1534
Apparently, anti-bots use "proof of work", which, according to the FSF, is the same as cryptomining, making it malware as it is done without
the end-user's permission.

>Sure, Anubis and go-away is Free Software (both are MIT licensed) so what's the FSF grudge?
The scheme where it is done is too similar to a malware to be accepted as respecting the end-users' autonomy, independence, and freedoms.

>Source
http://fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/our-small-team-vs-millions-of-bots/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptojacking

Look at how FSF did it without resorting to crytomining: >>1479

Anon

on 2025-10-07 10:00 No.1533
Go-away is meant to filter low effort bot scraping: there's no point in issuing triple challenges all the time, and there's even less of a point in having validation last a short time.
It's time to search for a better solution instead of piling on bandaids.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 07:33 No.1532
post your favorite lesser-known websites, here's some of mine:
arete.network
rdrama.net
communities.win
wikileaks.org
www.amren.com (cringe cloudflare captcha)
kingdomtruther.com

Anon

on 2025-10-07 07:30 No.1531
Thank You Fijxu

Anon

on 2025-10-07 07:14 No.1530
>>1526
Listen up folks — it is pretty safe to say the server is BACK IN BUSINESS! :-D

Anon

on 2025-10-07 06:48 No.1529
Yeah nadeko is down right now, but the minecraft server works (:

Fuck Youtube btw

Anon

on 2025-10-07 06:44 No.1528
>>1504
>something which acts anti-privacy
More like privacy-agnostic, I don't see ill intent here.

It's basically all the same:
- YouTube wants money, bots make it harder for them, they block bots and harm low amount of legit users
- Fijxu wants to run stable instance, bots make it harder for him, Fijxu blocks bots and harms low amount of legit users
Projects mostly start with good intent until real life make them do fucked up decisions.

Would be funny if yt-dlp changed its stance on invidious and added support, as well as captcha bypass. At that point we would have gone full circlejerk and internet could be closed for good.

invidious

on 2025-10-07 06:17 No.1527
Hi, coming here for invidious. Sadly, the service is down. Hope it will be back shortly!

Anon

on 2025-10-07 05:30 No.1526
I want you all to know this — THE SERVER (inv.nadeko.net) IS DOWN; AGAIN! >:o[

Anon

on 2025-10-07 03:57 No.1525
>>1524
An internet without privacy for its users is like a house without any support beams. Totally unsafe in every way, completely unfit for the owner or their guests, and unstructurally sound to the core.

Anon

on 2025-10-07 01:39 No.1524
>>1513
Isn't the whole point of Chat Control to be device-based? They might grab what you use no matter what.

Anon

on 2025-10-06 23:13 No.1523
jews

Anon

on 2025-10-06 21:36 No.1522
>>1500
>OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH!
>GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED
We get the point. You're retarded.

>5108073328584689523533903348554098233210687514985379707 YEARS!
That's an absurdly high number of years.

Anon

on 2025-10-06 21:06 No.1521
>>1516
Finally, someone said it. i knew techrights was sus
if only there was a credible tech news sites

Anon

on 2025-10-06 19:36 No.1520
>>1518
This has been happening to me every time I attempt to use the public instance (never used the .onion link, don't use Tor). Doesn't matter which video it is. Not trying to hack, flood, or clog invidious's traffic with spambots so I have no idea why this is.

Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule e9dd27462f7df3d23a77cb91d5c0d0b0/64611ec8cb0e2da6c931

Anon

on 2025-10-06 19:08 No.1519
>>1518
works now, thanks a lot

Fijxu

on 2025-10-06 18:48 No.1518
>>1515
Fixed, try again

Anon

on 2025-10-06 18:15 No.1517
>>1516
..., which the US' is not
Gonna clarify, not found guilty of that yet*

Anon

on 2025-10-06 18:13 No.1516
>>1511
Those techrights articles are BS
NYT is controlled by the CIA, so what if Trump wants to sue them.
Keir Stahmer is not some "worker's party advocate". Half of the UK's parliament are pedophiles, which the US' is not
That whole article is just a rant on anyone who isnt trans or gay or black or cyberbullied
It might as well be a collection of posts from bluesky or the writings on Destiny's rubber room walls
Apple is far more controlled by the CCP than the US, their whole production relies on the CCP's cooperation, not US'. Their icloud scanning "feature" was forced by the UK, not the US. But Trump bad and UK wonderful so that wont get mentioned

Anon

on 2025-10-06 18:06 No.1515
for some reason this error always happens on the .onion but going to nadeko.net (still through Tor) works

Error: access denied: denied by administrative rule e917d397285e3a00f05c9c3ebf59e97a/75ca35fd7d644c91a083

Fijxu

on 2025-10-06 18:01 No.1514
>>1513
Already built, we have yggdrasil and I2P.

https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/
https://i2pd.website/

Anon

on 2025-10-06 17:34 No.1513
>>1512
we could build a decentralized p2p mesh network
kinda like tor but without the ISP middleman

Anon

on 2025-10-06 13:02 No.1512
>>1509
If so, what can we do to circumvent it? We can't just go outside to send mails physically

a

on 2025-10-06 12:06 No.1511
>>1508
>>1510
Don't forget TiVoization, the proprietary tyrant that lives on today as UEFI Restricted Boot, where only Microsoft-approved OS will boot and nothing else.

>Basically Chat Control on the CPU level.

>Right to Read
http://gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
>Techrights on Chat Control
http://techrights.org/n/2025/09/18/Project_2030_to_Cover_How_Project_2025_Styled_Anti_Media_Zealot.shtml
http://techrights.org/n/2025/10/05/Chat_Control_2_Them_Not_2_U.shtml

Anon

on 2025-10-06 11:44 No.1510
>>1508
I feel like shit's gonna be inevitable no matter how hard we fight. I feel sick to the core

Anon

on 2025-10-06 10:42 No.1509
>>1508
If it does get passed I won't be surprised if some corrupt clowns write a similar bill here and it ends up passing the house. Another strike against anonymity, and a win for draconian corporations, datamining advertisers and three-letter government agencies.

Anon

on 2025-10-06 09:44 No.1508
Am I get the feeling that Chat Control is close to being passed. Like I'm really worried about Germany's stance on such proposal

birdi

on 2025-10-06 07:11 No.1507
Let me give an example: When i load a 5 hour long video that wasn't split into multiple parts for some reason, with the intent on watching a single hour from the 3 hour mark i left off last time. I load the vid in your instance and i have to start the video in order to skip ahead, because i can only do that with arguments not from the JS-player for some reason. Then let's say that after half an hour of watching the instance starts loading from YT past the 4 hour mark (which i wasn't going to watch at that time) and it sends it to me, wasting the bandwidth.

If i could skip ahead without starting the video and set another point on the bar limiting how far ahead the instance will have to load and another point that stops loading at a given time mark and then has to be re-set again in order to load again, your instance will only have to load from YT the 1 hour 3 to 4 hr mark as opposed to loading the beginning for no reason and then still loading past the 4 hour.

birdi

on 2025-10-06 06:58 No.1506
>>1494
I wasn't going to bother with the poll anyway since i'm fine with the backends you have now, i just asked that since obviously the Tor posters here are mad, calling you anti-privacy because of the JS-captcha.

My recommandation is to consider the buffering limit thing i said in the previous post and maybe ask the invidious devs on github to implement it, because i would definitely use that.

Anon

on 2025-10-06 01:50 No.1505
What's with the "denied by administrative rule" error popping up all of a sudden? The site worked just fine a few hours prior. What is it rejecting exactly, my IP, user agent or anything else?

Anon

on 2025-10-06 01:41 No.1504
>>1480
>I'll remove JS on Tor tho

Apparently this instance went TOR-HOSTILE recently, as it loads js-challenge and then BooM! Forbidden

Looks like some false benevolence is somewhere, something which acts anti-privacy in the name of anti-abuse (just like Netflix et al.)

Anon

on 2025-10-06 00:06 No.1503
>denied by administrative rule

The hell with this. Off to VidLii

Anon

on 2025-10-05 23:59 No.1502
>>1491
A lot of people are really fed up with everything what is going on. They are just completely disorganized, so they vent where they can.

bluechinchompa

on 2025-10-05 21:50 No.1501
>>1499

dont forget to watch it on your TV as well and watch each AD fully.

Anon

on 2025-10-05 21:14 No.1500
OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH! FIXJEW! HOW DARE YOU REQUIRE JAVASCRIPT CAPTCHA ON INVIDIOUS! THAT'S IT! YOU ARE GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED GROUNDED FOR 5108073328584689523533903348554098233210687514985379707 YEARS!

snowflake

on 2025-10-05 20:29 No.1499
I'm boycotting Invidious and watching YouTube premium from now on since everyone here is a racist, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, anti-semetic neo-nazi. Fixju should be ashamed of themselves for allowing hate speech.

JS_Crapcuck

on 2025-10-05 20:21 No.1498
Don't blame fixju
Blame AI
Blame JewTube
Blame Jewgle

Fijxu

on 2025-10-05 18:46 No.1497
>>1495
Royalehosting AUP says only 25TB max monthly for VPS plans. I use around 80TB on each server.

Last month I used around 600TB (the sum of all servers) 😅

Fijxu

on 2025-10-05 18:34 No.1496
>>1494
I knew someone was going to ask that lol.
Basically there is no Alternative that does not use JS, or maybe there it is on Github, but I just wanted something to make the poll fast without having to host it myself.

Anon

on 2025-10-05 18:30 No.1495
if you are looking for a new EU provider for invidious check out royalehosting from the Netherlands, i use them for work as well and had zero issues

birdi

on 2025-10-05 18:21 No.1494
Fijxu-san, okay but i don't get why would no-JS be relevant if you're going to use strawpoll which doesn't work without it. I wonder if there are any better polling sites than it?

In any case, i think the invidious guys should focus more on possible features that reduce the bandwidth like for example when loading a gigantic video let's say 5+ hrs long, giving the user better buffering settings such as a starting position before actually starting the video or limiting the buffer amount, from the player UI or via a setting? That way your instance doesn't struggle as hard when someone loads an uncut livestream.

Fijxu

on 2025-10-05 17:37 No.1493
>>1491
Yeah I think I shouldn't enable comments ever again ^^'

People can't just behave themselves, I left the comment open section to get some feedback but now there is people commenting things like "i have voted now 9 times for US with mullvad, too powerful, 1 vote my ass."

This just makes it harder for me to guess which region needs more bandwidth to keep Invidious working fine for everyone.

Anon

on 2025-10-05 16:44 No.1492
anyone notice people recently using the word terrorism in their language very often?

BlueChinchompa

on 2025-10-05 16:40 No.1491
the comments on the strawpoll have to be AI generated I swear surely that many people arent going to be cancerous under a comment section of a poll asking for new backends smh.

Fijxu

on 2025-10-05 16:16 No.1490
>>1485
>Just curious, what kind of abuse your instances are facing? Any stats you can share?
I barely have any stats since I only enable logs to inspect bot traffic from time to time, but they are easy to identify if you take a look at some patterns ;3

>Also, while being strong anti-JS autist, I find current «JS» captcha acceptable. It's literally one line of code you can «execute» manually once a week without allowing JS. Go check page source.
Yep, although I'm going to change that, you will no longer able to use the same cookie for 7 days, I'll change that to a specific interval

Fijxu

on 2025-10-05 16:00 No.1489
>>1482
>>1488
It breaks regularly, Reddit likes to block my IP and when I want to search for something on the internet and the only useful result seems to be a reddit question, I get slapped on the face by Reddit saying I'm blocked. Fucking cunts. Stop using Reddit please

Anon

on 2025-10-05 13:55 No.1488
>>1482

I think all the redlib instances are broken. The instance is technically up so the service status says it's up, but it's really just completely broken.

I am begging and pleading for it to be fixed. I don't ever want to touch Reddit.com.

Anon

on 2025-10-05 12:11 No.1487
It's crazy how many people responded to your Invidious straw poll. I didn't realize just how many people regularly use your site.

Anon

on 2025-10-05 11:14 No.1486
why is Fijxu too cute?

Anon

on 2025-10-04 22:46 No.1485
>>1475
>Since when did AI companies connect to .onion websites?
Not as hard as you think, they absolutely might do that.
Also, while being strong anti-JS autist, I find current «JS» captcha acceptable. It's literally one line of code you can «execute» manually once a week without allowing JS. Go check page source.

>>1480
Just curious, what kind of abuse your instances are facing? Any stats you can share?

Anon

on 2025-10-04 21:03 No.1484
>>1479
It's those terrorist trans women ddosing again
AI companies never could generate all this traffic
It's all they want and they won't stop before their leftists extremist executives won't tell them to stop
They only want suffering

Anon

on 2025-10-04 16:05 No.1483
>>1479

Wow, thoses attacks on Savannah explains why Guix has been so slow to update for me. I had to switch over to Codeberg to get it to work consistently.

Anon

on 2025-10-04 15:27 No.1482
Seems like redlib is broken

Anon

on 2025-10-04 00:03 No.1481
Mega diddy based. Thank you for your service brave soldier.

Fijxu

on 2025-10-03 13:58 No.1480
>>1475
I'm not protecting the instance against AI (well they are also included), I'm protecting it against abusers.
I'll remove JS on Tor tho ;). I also have PoW enabled for Tor

a

on 2025-10-03 13:33 No.1479
>To those who put anti-bots
http://fsf.org/bulletin/2025/spring/defending-savannah-from-ddos-attacks
http://thenewstack.io/how-the-free-software-foundation-battles-the-llm-bots/

>Guide
http://fsf.org/bulletin/2024/fall/fsf-sysops-cleaning-up-the-internet

TL;DR
>Use an uptime monitor
http://status.nadeko.net/status/nadekonet
>Look at the logs for suspicious access activities
>Crosscheck the associated IPs using IPtoASN and ipset
http://ipset.netfilter.org/
>Use the firewall to block the offending addresses.

Anon

on 2025-10-03 13:15 No.1478
>>1473
rebel 24/7, expose corruption and surveillance to everyone, spread the word of Jesus
but at the end of the day when free access to the internet is cut off, it seems like the only outcome of that is total war, and with AI kill drones, bioweapons, etc all bets are off. remember these people say they want to kill 90% of the population and enslave the rest of the 10% just read any U.N. "plan for the future", listen to Bill Gates' TED talks or just read the georgia guidestones

Anon

on 2025-10-03 12:44 No.1477
>>1476
but what about the gov?

RICOTTA_19216

on 2025-10-03 12:38 No.1476
>>1473
That is like talking about people in the table, this gigantic table, all people leave table, the only one with you in the other side is depression (aka the hitman), and you are next to it, what do you do?
You stand up and leave somewhere else, what are you doing sitting anyway?
I don't sit here, I am standing up as I am typing this, last weekend I dunno which, my whole body hurt! Then this other weekend only my shoulders hurt... Suddenly the pains below my body all gone

I care for my health!

To
>>1470
The Internet is our way to navigate the World Wide Web
But the web as a whole is still what we make of it
Otherwise this site would not exist
This page will lit you up!
https://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/

Seriously, flat out dive your face into this
You'll end up here
https://jsfree.org/
Wait a second... I see invidious in that list!
Ohhh and DuckDuckGo HTML version, I use that! I was suggested to use it because I keep using IE :P

Anon

on 2025-10-03 12:31 No.1475
Requiring javascript on Tor instances "to block scrapers" is so stupid that it makes me think it's malicious. Since when did AI companies connect to .onion websites? Some of us have OPSEC requirements that don't allow for javascript.

Status